Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:34023
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8116 of 2025 Smt. Priyanka Pandey W/o Shri Rakesh Rajan Pandey, Aged About 39 Years Working On The Post Of Lecturer (Lb) Govt. H.S. School Songara Block Pratappur District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Education, Directorate Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Chairman/ President District Level Rationalization Committee Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Joint Director Education Division Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Block Education Officer, Pratappur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri VK Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Ajit Singh, GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board 18.07.2025
1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 16.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.22 11:41:59 +0530
Wps 8116 of 2025 2 and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period.
3.
Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated
07.07.2025.
4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances, and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma