Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35555 (BOM)

RATIKANT R. BANDEKAR., v. JENNYTECH SERVICES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, HEMANT DHARMA CHODANKAR.,

CRIA/73/2016 · 2025-08-01

Smt Bharati Dangre

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRIA 73 of 2016 Amrut IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.73 OF 2016 RATIKANT R. BANDEKAR., ... APPELLANT Versus JENNYTECH SERVICES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, HEMANT DHARMA CHODANKAR., ... RESPONDENT Mr Sudesh Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Ms Marie Rosette Pereira, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED :- 1st August, 2025 P.C.: The learned Senior Counsel Mr Usgaonkar, on instructions, seek withdrawal of the appeal in view of the payment under dispute has already been received from the accused and the accused has demised. Permission granted. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. BHARATI DANGRE, J. 1st August, 2025 2025:BHC-GOA:1414 Signed by: AMRUT NAGESH TARI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 04/08/2025 17:41:24