Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, v. Himachal Pradesh Horticultural Produce Marketing
WA/447/2015 · 2025-09-15
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35555 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35555 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010568502015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESfi- AT AMARAVATI , AN/;," TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI - WRIT APPEAL NO: 447 QF 2015 04 nc'^014''''?^ o against order dated 04-09-2014 in W.P.No.17106 of 2014 on the file of High Court. ^ Between:
1. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati Executive Officer. 2. The Joint Executive Officer, Tirumala Chittoor District. 3. The Estate Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, District. 4. The Asst. Executive Officer(Revenue), Tirumala Tirupati, Chittoor District. CHIEF JUSTICE Chittoor District, Rept. by its ' i , Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati Tirupati, Chittoor Tirupati Devasthanam ...Appellants/Respondents R1 to R4 in W.P. No.17106/2014^ AND 1- Himachal Pradesh Horticultural Produce Marketing & Processing Corporation Limited, Nigam Vihar, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh- 171 002, Repd. by its Regional Manager, 34/1 A-3, Ennore Express High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai. 2. V. Rushikeshi S/o Sri V Janardhan Hindu, Aged about 35 years, Occ:Saiestnan, Shop No.15, Lepakshi,689, Baiajinagar, Tirumala, Chittoor District. 3. P. Guruswamy S/o P. Mangaiah Hindu. Aged about 57 Occ:Salesman, Chittekudu, 519 Baiajinagar, Tirumala
4. N. Ravi Kumar S/o Late N Nadamuni years, Chittoor District. Hindu, , Aged about 56 R/o.Door No. 18-3-5 8/7B, Shanthi Nagar, years. OcciSalesman, Mookalimitta Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5. K. Bhasker S/o K. Nagender, Hindu, Aged about 28 yrs. Occ.Salesman, Shop No.ATC., in front of Cottage No. 104, 566 Baiajinagar, Tirumala, Chittoor District. 6. L. Prakash S/o Ramakrishnaiah, Occ.Salesman, Hindu, Aged about 42 Bhavani Nagar, yrs. Akasaganga, R/o.18-1-410/A2 Tirupati, Chittoor District. ■■.Respondents/Petitioners in W.P.No.17106/2014" lA NO: 2 OF 2015fWAMP 122« of 9nii;| Petition under Section isfCPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to uspend the order of the learned Single Judge in writ petition W.P.No.17106 of 2014, dated 4*^ September, 2014, Appeal. during the pendency of the above Writ lA NO: 3 OF 2015fWAMP 14fi9 OF 20151 'on under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the documents filed by the Corporation in the interest of Justice along With this Petition as they are part and parcel.
/ / jA NO: 4 OF 2015(WAMP 2279 Qp 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court receive the additional documents namely (1) Tender Notification may be pleased to published by the Executive Officer, TTD, in Eenadu and Saakshi dt. 02.09.2015 Representation of HMPC dated 07.09.2015 (2) and (3) Tender Schedule and its conditions, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 5 OF 2015rWAMP 2539 OF Petition under Section 15rcPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 14.10.2015 passed in WA No. 447 of 2015 by this Court for a period of four weeks or till the S.L.P. is decided by the Hon ble Surpeme Court, in the interest of justice. ^ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N.V.S. PRASADA VARMA, SC FOR TTD( Not Present). Counsel for the Respondents: SRI MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
• / Bench Sr.No:- APHC010568502015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 18 [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 447 of 2015 ...Appellants Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, and others Vs. Himachal Pradesh Horticultural Produce Marketing and Processing Corporation Limited and others ...Respondents ********** None Advocate for Appellants Advocate for Respondents Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 16th September 2025 PC : None for the appellants. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAWIESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To One CC to Sri N.V.S. Prasada Varma, SC for TTD[OPUC]^
2. One CC to Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies. 1
►i?
HIGH COURT DATED: 16/09/2025
JUDGMENT WA No.447 OF 2015 i 2 3 SEP 2025 t ^ Current Section *7^ ITS DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS