.2#2gr J r qRIEH[ N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA [3460] PRADESH AT AMARAVATl THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9139 OF 2024 Betwee n : TaIIapareddy Sarada, W/o TaIIapareddy Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 24 years, R/o D.No.4-69-1, near Bodurai, Rompicherla Mandal, Rami Reddy Palem, Rompicherla, Guntur District. Petitioner/Accused No.6 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi, Nelapadu, Guntur District. Respondent Petition under sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of her arrest in crime in FIR.No.133 of 2024 on the file of Narasaraopet ll Town Police Station, Palnadu District. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of srl' AKUIA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following; ORDER: THE HONOURABL,E SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9139 of 2024 1. The present application is filed under Sections 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail in the event of her arrest in connection with Cr.No.133 of 2024 of Narsaraope't ll Town Police Station, Palnadu District. The Crime was registered for the offences under Sections 98 and 99 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). 2. Heard Sri P.Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State. 3. Perused the record. 4. The Petitioner herein is A.6 in the above crime. 5. This petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail before this Court by the petitioner/A.6 v'ithout approaching the District Court. On posing a query to the counsel as to why Petitioner do not approach the D'lstrict Court for seeking anticipatory bail, the counsel for the Petitioner submits that as there was imminent threat of arrest they have filed the present petition before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 6. This Court is not satisfied with the submission made by the counsel for the Petitioner. The Petitioner/A.6 shall approach the concerned District .- .-ir+-i,rf, Court for grant of anticipatory bail. However, to protect her interest, the Petitioner/A.6 shall not be arrested in connection with the above crl'me for 4 a period of ten (10) days from today. 7. Accordingly, the crI'minaI Petl'tion is disposed of. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. sD/-N.NAGAMMA lSTRAR /ITRUE COPY// To, 1. The Additional Junior Civil Judge : : Narasaraopet 2. The S.H.O., Narasaraopet ll Town Police Station, Palnadu Distr-lot 3. One CC to SRl. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 5. One spare copy Ki -Q-I6j ` ,_i HIGH COURT VN,J DATED-..02/01 /2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.9139 of 2024 ALLOWED