CAREV 5 of 2025 shakuntala IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.5 OF 2025 NADINE MARIE LEMOS REP. BY POA HOLDER SONIA LEMOS AND 3 ORS ... APPLICANTS Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Mr. Parag Rao with Mr. Akhil Parrikar, Advocates for Applicants. Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 4 to 6. Mr. Manish Salkar, Government Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATED :- 7th July, 2025 P.C. 1. The review petition is filed seeking the review of the order dated 21/04/2025, passed by us in Writ Petition No.108/2025, when we had disposed of the petition with a direction to the Village Panchayat, Candolim, to take the proceedings in the show cause notice issued u/s 66(3) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, against the respondent no. 7 to its logical end. 2. Mr. Parag Rao, learned counsel representing the petitioner, has filed the review petition and it is his contention that the structure, apart from the fact that it is illegal, was also violative of various other norms and therefore, directions were also sought in the petition, to all such 7th July, 2025 2025:BHC-GOA:1126-DB CAREV 5 of 2025 authorities, to take cognizance thereof. Upon hearing Mr. Rao, we are of the view that there is no scope for reviewing our order, as we had clearly stated that the Village Panchayat shall take action on the said show cause notice. If the show cause notice is sustained and the structure of Respondent No. 7 is found liable for demolition, the Panchayat shall demolish it in accordance with law. Consequently, other compliances will not deserve consideration. 3. We, therefore, do not find any ground made out for entertaining the review petition and hence, we dispose of the petition. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J. 7th July, 2025 Signed by: SHAKUNTALA ZALMI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 08/07/2025 17:43:29