Saroj Yadav @ Saroj Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./24829/2025 · 2025-07-15
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35547 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35547 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24829 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ======================================================
1. Saroj Yadav @ Saroj Kumar Yadav S/o Sri Bhagwan Yadav R/o vill - Chhota Sasaram, P.s.- Udwantnagar (Gajrajganj O.P), Distt.- Bhojpur
2. Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Sri Bhagwan Yadav R/o vill - Chhota Sasaram, P.s.- Udwantnagar (Gajrajganj O.P), Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP For the Informant : Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352, 318(4), 316(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1, namely Saroj Yadav, is alleged to have assaulted on head of informant by means of iron rod and Petitioner No. 2, namely Manoj Yadav,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24829 of 2025(3) dt.15-07-2025 2/3 along with co-accused Bandhan Yadav, is alleged to have assaulted informant by means of lathi.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute a simple maar peet took place. Doctor has found the injuries simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 532 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24829 of 2025(3) dt.15-07-2025 3/3 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T