PARKASH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/15366/2025 · 2025-03-21
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35543 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35543 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113
CRM-M-15366-2025 Date of Decision : March 21, 2025
PARKASH AND ANOTHER
.....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 528 of the BNSS for issuance of a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct proper thoroughly fair investigation in the matter through any senior police official and to take appropriate legal action in the complaint dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure P-1).
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the complaint dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner.
Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar is directed to look into the complaint dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The order so passed in the said complaint shall be communicated to the petitioners within a period of one week thereafter.
The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
March 21, 2025
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) ajay-1
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No
Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No
AJAY KUMAR 2025.03.21 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh