1 ( 2025:HHC:45984 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.576 of 2022 Date of Decision: 29.12.2025 Dil Bahadur …Petitioner Versus The H.P. State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. …..Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Petitioner in person with Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Petitioner-Dil Bahadur has filed the present Criminal Revision against the judgment dated 20.09.2022, passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.12-Cr.A./10 of 2021, titled as ‘Dil Bahadur versus The H.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd’. 2. By way of judgment dated 20.09.2022, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, filed 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:45984 by the petitioner, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.01.2021, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., (hereinafter called as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Complaint No.30/3 of 2015, titled as ‘H.P. State Co-operative Bank versus Dil Bahadur’. 3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.01.2021, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,15,000/- to the complainant. 4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned Appellate Court, the present Criminal Revision has been preferred. 5. Now, the petitioner has moved Cr.MP No.5631 of 2025, under Section 147 of NI Act, for compounding of offence. 3 ( 2025:HHC:45984 6. Statements of the petitioner, as well as, learned counsel, appearing for respondent have been recorded, in which, they have agreed that the dispute, with regard to Cheque No.096637, has been settled, between the parties. 7. Today i.e. 29.12.2025, learned counsel, appearing for respondent, under instructions, has stated, regarding the factum, as to why, respondent had filed the complaint, against the accused (petitioner), in which, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence have been passed, which have unsuccessfully been assailed, before the learned Appellate Court. He has also deposed that the matter has been settled with the petitioner. 8. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, has further deposed that the respondent has no objection, if the present revision petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned trial Court, are ordered to be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. 4 ( 2025:HHC:45984 9. Today, petitioner is also present before this Court and has also stated in the aforesaid terms. He has deposited some amount, before the learned trial Court. He has paid the entire settled amount to the respondent and now nothing is due against him with regard to the cheque in question. He has deposed that on the basis of the compromise, the present petition may be allowed by setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and he may be acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. 10. Apart from this, the petitioner-accused has also given an undertaking that he will deposit the compounding fee, within a period of eight six weeks from today and in case, he fails to deposit the compounding fee, within the stipulated period, the revision petition may be treated, as dismissed and in that eventuality, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court. 11. Considering the statements of the parties, as well as, considering the fact that the matter has been 5 ( 2025:HHC:45984 settled between the accused (petitioner) and the complainant, Cr.MP No.5631 of 2025, is allowed and the parties to the lis are permitted to compound the offence. 12. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.01.2021, passed by the learned trial Court, in Criminal Complaint No.30/3 of 2015, which has been affirmed by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No.12-Cr.A./10 of 2021, vide judgment dated 20.09.2022, are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. His personal and surety bonds are discharged. 13. However, this order shall be, subject to the deposit of 7.5% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee. 50% of the amount of compounding fee shall be deposited by the accused with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% of the aforesaid amount shall be deposited with the H.P. High Court Employees Welfare Association, within a period of six weeks from today. 6 ( 2025:HHC:45984 14. It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court, within a period of six weeks, then, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.01.2021, passed by learned trial Court and in that eventuality, he shall surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court. 15. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge December 29, 2025 (subhash)