Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35538 (RAJ)

MANISH SON OF SHRI JAGDISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7818/2019 · 2025-07-29

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28595] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7818/2019 Manish Son Of Shri Jagdish, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of Village Kaysa, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Alwar. 4. The S.h.o Police Station, Mandhan, District Alwar. 5. Smt. Poonam Devi Wife Of Shri Manish, D/o Shri Suresh Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of Kaysa, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar At Present Partapur, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Goyal and Ms. Vaishnavi for Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP, Mr. D.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Sumit Sihag HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 29/07/2025 Learned counsel for the respondent does not want to press the stay vacation application for vacating the stay. Hence, the stay application is disposed of. It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parties have amicably settled their dispute. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to place on record the compromise entered between the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:28595] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7818/2019] It is also informed by learned counsel for the respondent that the respondent No.5 is residing with the petitioner and they have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and if the FIR lodged against the petitioner is quashed then the respondent No.5 have no objection. Considering the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent No.5, the FIR lodged against the petitioner by the respondent No.5 bearing No.131/2019, registered at Police Station Mandhan, District Alwar under Sections 498-A, 406 and 377 of IPC is hereby quashed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/20