132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15718-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:29.04.2025 Dhyan Foundation Gaushala through its authorized representative Shweta Singh …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and Anr. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. L. M Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) CRM-15039-2025 1. Application is allowed as prayed for, subject to just all exceptions. 2. Annexure P-10 is taken on record. Main case 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to modify the order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nuh in Criminal Revision No.45 of 2025 dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-8) to the extent that during the pendency of the criminal revision, the order dated 07.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Trial Court may also be stayed. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that HITESH 2025.04.30 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-15718-2025 (O&M) -2 the petitioner has filed an interim application for grant of same relief before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh and the Revisional Court may be directed to decide the stay application in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully. 6. I find the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner to be fair and genuine. 7. Consequently, the Revisional Court/Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh is directed to decide the interim application for grant of stay within a period of 10 days from today. 8. Needless to observe that the Revisional Court shall grant an opportunity of effecting hearing to both the sides before passing the speaking order. 9. Disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 29.04.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.04.30 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh