- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:187 WP No. 08 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 08 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MRS B N PUSHPA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS W/O S LAKSHMANA KHUMARAA D/O B V NARAYANASWAMY R/AT VAPASANDRA-I DIVISION OPP A C COMPOUND CHIKKABALLAPUR 562101 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO 584/1, 9TH MAIN 3RD A CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU 61 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.JAGADEESHA P.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR L MALLESH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE LINGAPPA R/AT NO 1, 1ST CROSS KODIPALYA, ESHWARNAGAR KONANAKUNTE POST BENGALURU 560062. 2. MR L MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LAKSHMINARAYANACHARI R/AT NO 2, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD YELACHENAHALLI, BENGALURU 560078. 3. MR J K ANANDH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:187 WP No. 08 of 2024 S/O KRISHNAPPA R/AT NO 264, 3RD MAIN KRISHNAPPA COMPOUND JARAGANAHALLI, BENGALURU 560078. 4. MR M GURURAJU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE MAYIGAPPA R/AT NO 378, 8TH CROSS INDUSTRIAL TOWN, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU 560044. 5. MR T D JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O T V DORAIRAJAN R/AT NO K-1, TYPE III CPWD QUARTERS, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ON INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED: 02/11/2023 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 26449/2010 PASSED BY THE LXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU, CCH NO. 74 AS PER ANNEXURE-A ALLOWING THE APPLICATION TO PRODUCED THE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY IN O.S. NO. 26449/2010 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:187 WP No. 08 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of subsequent event, the relief sought by the petitioner in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for respondents is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3