2025:JHHC:13095 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 2101 of 2025 ---- Kamla Kiran Minj, aged about 49 years, wife of Patric Kindo, Resident of South Dumbertoli, P.O.-Gumla, P.S.- Gumla, District-Gumla, State-Jharkhand ...Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla, P.O.- Gumla, P.S.- Gumla, District-Gumla 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Gumla, P.O. - Gumla, P.S. Gumla, District - Gumla. 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Raidih, Gumla, P.O.-Gumla, P.S- Gumla, District Gumla...Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioners : Mr. Dhanajay Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Shivam Singh, A.C to S.C.-II -- 02/01.05.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: a. For a direction upon the Respondent Authorities to pay the difference of amount as per the 6th Pay Revision on the basis of the pay fixation done by the competent authority as well as approved by the District Accounts Officer with interest, since the pay fixation has been done in the year 2017 itself. b. For a further direction upon the Respondents to pay the salary of the petitioner on the basis of the pay fixation done by the competent authority and approved by the District Accounts Officer with interest, since the pay fixation has been done as back in the year 2017, as contained in Annexures-7 to 9. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court towards Annexure-7, whereby the pay of the petitioner was fixed from the date of her joining and thereafter vide order dated 28.06.2017 she was granted Senior Scale and the same was approved by the competent authority. Thereafter, vide Annexure-11 a further direction was given to pay the salary to this 2025:JHHC:13095 ) 2 petitioner; however, for the reasons best known to them the claim of the petitioner has not yet been redressed and no payment has been made with regard to claim made in this writ application. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as per his instruction and Annexures- 13 and 15, the matter is under process. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the 4th Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in consultation with 5th Respondent and after verification of the records, especially Annexures-7, 8 & 9, pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 10 weeks. It goes without saying that from Annexures-13 & 15, it appears that the claim of the petitioner is under process; as such, the entire admitted amount be paid within a further period of 4 weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk