Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:28488 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3198 of 2019 1 - Sushil Agrawal S/o Khusiram Agrawal Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Tahsildar Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 3 - Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o Rambhagat Gupta Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 4 - Devendra Gupta S/o Rambhagat Gupta Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 5 - Pradeep Agrawal S/o Khusiram Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Geeta Gupta Wd/o Late. Ramesh Gupta Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 7 - Arnav Gupta S/o Late Ramesh Gupta Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh 8 - Aarushi Gupta S/o Late Ramesh Gupta Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents SMT NIRMALA RAO
-2- For Petitioner : Shri Shashwat Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Prateek Tiwari, P.L. For Respondents No.3 & 4 : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 27.06.2025
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous.
2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Nimmi