Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35527 (PAT)

Vikaram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29019/2025 · 2025-07-04

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29019 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1029 Year-2016 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Buxar ====================================================== Vikaram Kumar S/o Late Laxman Prasad Turha Resident of Mohalla- Civil Lines, Badi Bazar, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar (Town), Distt.- Buxar .. ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Manu Kumar Turha @ Manu Prasad Turha S/o Ashok Kumar Turha Resident of Vill.- Turha Toli, Main Road, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar Town, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, Advocate Mr. Rahul @ Rahul Mishra, Advocate Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate Ms. Priya Vardhan, Advocate For the State : Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 04-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a complaint case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 504, 406, 420, 384, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120B and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per complaint case it is alleged that this petitioner and complainant were employees of the same company and they deposited the money of the investors/customers in the said company under different schemes. It is alleged that this petitioner, along with other co- accused persons, did not return the money of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29019 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 2/3 investors/customers after maturity and embezzled money amounting to Rs. 2,00,00,000/-. It is further alleged that on 19.11.2016, this petitioner along with co-accused person, armed with country made gun, threatened the complainant to withdraw the complaint. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, the present case is counter-blast of Buxar Town P.S. Case No. 518 of 2016 which was lodged earlier on 19.11.2016 against the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2. by brother of this petitioner in which police submitted chargesheet against OP No. 2. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely Md. Kalim, who is alleged to have defalcated the investors money has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 12.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41880 of 2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedents and he is in custody since 04.02.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedents and period of custody, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29019 of 2025(3) dt.04-07-2025 3/3 7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Complaint Case No. 1029 of 2016. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T