[2025:RJ-JP:1610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16321/2024 1. 2. Dilkhush @ Dillu S/o Shankar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Phariya, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)- 322001. (At Present In Jail, District Sawai Madhopur). Hansraj @ Golu S/o Bajranga, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Phariya, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)- 322001. (At Present In District Jail, Tonk, District Tonk). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Shekhawat & Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Hari Ram Gurjar, complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.0297/2024 registered at Police Station Khandar District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 333, 351(2), and 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There are cross cases. He further submits that three persons from petitioner’s side have sustained several injuries. Learned counsel further submits that except one case under Section 379 and 120B [2025:RJ-JP:1610] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16321/2024] IPC, no other case is pending against the petitioner No.2-Hansraj & Golu. The petitioners are in custody since 26.11.2024. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the complainant submits there is specific allegations against the petitioner No.1-Dilkhus @ Dillu to cause injury on the head of Prem Singh and one case has been registered against petitioner No.2-Hansraj @ Golu and investigation is still going on. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case especially the fact that there is specific allegation on the accused- petitioner-Dilkhush to cause injury, I do not find it a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner-Dilkhush @ Dillu. Accordingly, the bail application of petitioner No.1-Dilkhush @ Dillu is hereby dismissed. 6. As far as other accused petitioner No.2- Hansraj @ Golu is concerned, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner to cause specific injury to the injured, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application of petitioner No.2 is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Hansraj @ Golu S/o Bajranga shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a [2025:RJ-JP:1610] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16321/2024] personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Sunita/254