Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35523 (RAJ)

AARIF S/O SHRI BARKHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16465/2024 · 2025-01-23

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16465/2024 1. Aarif S/o Shri Barkhan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Todabheem, Mukhvara, Police Station Todabheem, District Gangapur City (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dholpur). 2. Pacchu S/o Shri Jamil, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Todabheem, Mukhvara, Police Station Todabheem, District Gangapur City (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 999/2025 1. Noor Aalam S/o Shakoor, R/o Todabheem, Mukhbara, Police Station Todabheem, District Gangapur City. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dholpur). 2. Sanu S/o Shri Rijvan, R/o Todabheem, Mukhbara, Police Station Todabheem, District Gangapur City. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 23/01/2025 (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16465/2024] 1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B. N. S. S. in connection with FIR No.452/2024 Registered at Police Station Maniya, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of B. N. S., Sections 3(1) and 25(1)(b) of Arms Act and Section 11 of Rajasthan Dacoitee Affected Area Act, 1985 (later on offence(s) under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of B. N. S., Sections 3(1),4/25 of Arms Act & Section 11 of RDA Act, 1985 were found to have been made out). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They are behind the bars since 27.09.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioners. Similarly situated co-accused Mustaq Khan has been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 19.12.2024 in S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.15973/2024. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Dy.G.A. has opposed the bail applications. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Aarif S/o Shri Barkhan, Pacchu S/o Shri Jamil, Noor Aalam S/o Shakoor & Sanu S/o Shri Rijvan be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16465/2024] satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. A copy of this order be placed in the connected file. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/3-4