Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229
Sanju
Sanjay and another
CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: None. *** NAMIT KUMAR
1. The applicant/appellant is challenging the impugned judgment dated 20.02.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur whereby the respondents have been acquitted from
2. On the last date of hearing i.e. passed:- no representation on behalf of the applicant one is present to represent the applicant about the date fixed.”
3. As per office report, learned counsel for the applicant Sanjeev Kumar and Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocates have been in e-mail and copy of the said email has also been placed on record at Flag ‘A’. However, still there is no representation on behalf of the applicant appears that the applicant
4. Dismissed for non
May 15, 2025 Pankaj*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM
Date of Decision:
Versus and another
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None. ***
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The applicant/appellant is challenging the impugned judgment dated 20.02.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur whereby the respondents have been acquitted from the charges framed against them. On the last date of hearing i.e. 23.10.2024, the following order was
“Order sheet shows that on the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the applicant one is present to represent the applicant In the interest of justice, adjourned to 15.05.2025. Registry to inform learned counsel for the applicant about the date fixed.” As per office report, learned counsel for the applicant Sanjeev Kumar and Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocates have been in mail and copy of the said email has also been placed on record at Flag ‘A’. However, still there is no representation on behalf of the applicant appears that the applicant-appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-676-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision:15.05.2025
... Petitioner
... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR The applicant/appellant is challenging the impugned judgment dated 20.02.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur whereby the charges framed against them. 23.10.2024, the following order was
“Order sheet shows that on the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the applicant-appellant. Even today no one is present to represent the applicant-appellant. justice, adjourned to 15.05.2025.
Registry to inform learned counsel for the applicant-appellant As per office report, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocates have been informed through mail and copy of the said email has also been placed on record at Flag ‘A’. However, still there is no representation on behalf of the applicant-appellant. It appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. (NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
: Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
... Petitioner ... Respondents The applicant/appellant is challenging the impugned judgment dated 20.02.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur whereby the 23.10.2024, the following order was
“Order sheet shows that on the last date of hearing there was appellant. Even today no appellant appellant, Mr. formed through mail and copy of the said email has also been placed on record at Flag ‘A’. appellant. It PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.05.16 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh