1 2025:CGHC:38752 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8156 of 2025 1 - Bhimeshwar Patel S/o Shri Padum Lal Patel Aged About 42 Years Occupation - Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Government Girls Primary School - Sariya, Block- Baramkela, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) R/o Village - Baramkela, Block- Baramkela, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Block-3, First Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector/president Of District Rationalization Committee District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer/secretary Of District Rationalization Committee District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/president Of Rationalization Committee Tahsil - Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer/secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block - Baramkela, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Geeta Sidar Occupation - Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Government Primary School - Gadapara, Sariya, Block- Baramkela, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.05 19:46:01 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 05/08/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner bearing WPS No. 4719 of 2025, against his transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 17.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee, and in turn, the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection, if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 3 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved