Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3551 (JHR)

MUKUL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/22/2024 · 2025-03-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 22 of 2024 Mukul Kumar, Aged about 25 years, son of late Ram Bachan Prasad, Resident of Sita Lal Gali, Deo, P.O. & P.S. Deo, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). Presently residing at Flat No. 1 "D", Block "B", Arihant Residency, Chesire Home Road, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. Additional Director General of Police, CID/Vigilance, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Doranda, PO & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi. 4. Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Region, Govt of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 5. Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Region, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 6. Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi having office at Administrative Building, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O, P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 7. Superintendent of Police (City), Ranchi having office at Administrative Building, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 8. Officer Incharge, Bariatu Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi. 9. Sri Suresh Kumar Mandal, son of not known to the petitioner. Presently working as Officer Incharge, Bariatu Police Station, Bariatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi. 10. Sri Satish Gupta, son of not known to the petitioner, Sub Inspector of Police, Bariatu Police Station, Bariatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi. … Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondent : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III 05 / 11.03.2025 Heard the learned counsel for the Respondent but no one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that there is no merit in this petition hence the petitioner is not diligent in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-