DARA PAWL @ DARA CHINNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/399/2025 · 2025-01-27
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3551 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3551 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 399 OF 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A1 to A5, seeking anticipatory bail, in Crime No.37/2024 of Gollaprole Police Station, Kakinada District.
2. A case has been registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable u/Sec.341, 325, 506 read with 34 IPC.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief, is that the defacto complainant is having three sons and one daughter. He has Ac.0.15 cents of land in EBC Colony, Upparpeta, Chenurthi Village and property disputes arose within his family. A1, who is his elder brother, used to raise a dispute with him and his brother to claim the said property without giving any share to them. Subsequently, in the year 2019, a crime was registered at Gollaprolu police station vide F.I.R.No.209/2019. While so, on 22.01.2024 afternoon while he was proceeding towards Chendurthi village on his motorcycle, A1 restrained him by placing his motorcycle across his motorcycle and pushed him from motorcycle. Later A2 to A5 attacked him with iron rod and two knives and they beat him on his hands with iron rod and hacked him on his head with knife.
2
4. Heard. Perused the record.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that investigation is at nascent stage and some more witnesses are to be examined.
6. On a perusal of the material available on the record goes to show that there are specific overt acts attributed against the petitioner that they beat the defacto complainant with iron rods and knives with regard to property disputes. The defacto complainant is the father of the A1 and due to property dispute, A1, with the help of A2 to A5, beat the defacto complainant. As stated by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the investigation is at nascent and this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 27.01.2025 RD
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No: 399 of 2025
27.01.2025 RD