Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35509 (JHR)

MAKARIM MIAN ALIAS MUKARIM MIAN ALIAS MOKARIM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6006/2025 · 2025-10-16

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:32040 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 6006 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6006 of 2025 1. Makarim Mian @ Mukarim Mian @ Mokarim, aged about 71 years, son of Jabar Mian 2. Md. Rabbul Ansari @ Rabbul Ansari, aged about 22 years, son of Tahir Mian 3. Mubarak Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Late Abdul Ansari 4. Hussain Ansari, aged about 68 years, son of Abdul Mian 5. Safik Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Latif Mian 6. Salim Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Mukarim Mian 7. Sahabaj Ansari, aged about 21 years, son of Anar Ansari 8. Anul Ansari, aged about 23 years, son of Hussain Ansari All are residents of Village Tetriadangal, P.O. & P.S. Masalia, District- Dumka, Jharkhand … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. ----- 04/16.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.30 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 132, 121(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dumka. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegations are made that 35-40 unknown villagers assembled in a particular place and they pelted stone. He further submits that the FIR is there against 17 named accused persons and the petitioners are named in the FIR. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents, as disclosed in paragraph 14 of this application. ( 2025:JHHC:32040 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 6006 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners are named in the FIR. 5. Considering that although the petitioners are named in the FIR, however, 35-40 unknown villagers were also present on the spot and they were indulged in pelting stone and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.30 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 16th October, 2025 Ajay/