Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35502 (RAJ)

MOHAR SINGH @ MOHARIYA @ MUKHRAM S/O AGRASEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16340/2024 · 2025-01-16

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.16340/2024 Mohar Singh @ Mohariya @ Mukhram S/o Agrasen, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kansu Ki Dhani Tan Shyampura Police Station Bansur Kotputli Behror. (Accused In Sub Jail Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.357/2024, registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, for the offence(s) under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2024. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner was illegally taken away from his house on 23.10.2024, thereafter a false recovery has been shown against the accused-petitioner and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is [2025:RJ-JP:2333] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16340/2024] habitual offender and against him 11 criminal cases have been registered under the various offences, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Mohar Singh @ Mohariya @ Mukhram S/o Agrasen, in connection with FIR No.357/2024, registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-288