2025:JHHC:13382 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5959 of 2024 ------ 1.Arati Das, wife of late Mritunjoy Das 2.Mou Das, daughter of late Mritunjoy Das, Resident of flat no. F 6, 1st Floor, Akash Galaxy Apartment, Road No. 12, Kamar Para Road, Behala, PO Behala, PS Bhela, District Kolkata, West Bengal … … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Pawan Kumar Gupta, son of late Anand Swaroop Gupta, 3rd Street, Pee-Pee Compound, PO Ranchi GPO, PS Hindpiri, District Ranchi … … Opposite Parties With A.B.A. No.6024 of 2024 ------ 1.Arati Das, wife of late Mritunjoy Das 2.Mou Das, daughter of late Mritunjoy Das, 3.Madhulika Das, daughter of Mritunjoy Das Resident of flat no. F 6, 1st Floor, Akash Galaxy Apartment, Road No. 12, Kamar Para Road, Behala, PO Behala, PS Behala, District Kolkata, West Bengal … … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Pawan Kumar Gupta, son of late Anand Swaroop Gupta, 3rd Street, Pee-Pee Compound, PO Ranchi GPO, PS Hindpiri, District Ranchi ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Kumar Das, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, A.P.P. Ms. Anuradha Sahay, APP For the OP No.2 : Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate ----- 07/ 02.05.2025 Heard the parties. 2. The anticipatory bail application being ABA No. 5959 of 2024 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Lower Bazar Police Station Case No. 110 of 2021 pending in the 2025:JHHC:13382 2 Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. The anticipatory bail application being ABA No. 6024 of 2024 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 448, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Lower Bazar Police Station Case No. 91 of 2019 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 4. Learned A.P.Ps. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bails and submit that investigating officer will issue proper notices under section 41A of the Cr.PC / section 35(3) of BNSS to the petitioners as the earlier notices were not proper notices. 5. Considering their submission, I am of the view that there is no eminent threat of arrest now. 6. Further both the learned APPs submit that investigating officer has communicated to them that they did not feel to arrest the petitioners. 7. The petitioners are directed to cooperate in the investigation. 8. Accordingly, these Anticipatory Bail Applications stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3