IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.2180 of 2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 07.11. 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Ex. Pet. No.2180 of 2025 Pawan Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Ex. Pet. No.2181 of 2025 Ram Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Ex. Pet. No.2182 of 2025 Pradeep Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Ex. Pet. No.2185 of 2025 Dharam Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 5. Ex. Pet. No.2186 of 2025 Roop Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Ex. Pet. No.2192 of 2025 Dile Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Ex. Pet. No.2193 of 2025 Roshan Lal and Anr …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Ex. Pet. No.2194 of 2025 Tota Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Ex. Pet. No.2195 of 2025 Roop Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copies of separate and independent orders passed in case of each of the petitioners, considering their respective cases in light of judgments in question and consequent thereupon, the orders have also been placed on record passed in their cases fixing they pay. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that in view of the orders now passed by the respondents, the present execution petitions be closed, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 4 In view of the orders placed on record by the respondents and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the present execution petitions are disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 7, 2025 Judge R.Atal