1 2025:CGHC:17031 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 683 of 2019 1. Smt. Chandari Kashyap W/o Late Trinath Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Chokar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 2. Karan Kashyap S/o Late Trinath Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Chokar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 3. Bhagat Kashyap S/o Late Trinath Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Chokar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 4. Kheman Kashyap S/o Late Trinath Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Chokar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 5. Miss Jamuna Kashyap D/o Late Trinath Kashyap Aged About 13 Years (Minor Through Natural Guardian Smt. Chandari Kashyap (Mother), R/o Village Chokar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1. Kora Hosanna S/o Kora Ishan Residence Of Kumharpara Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh. (Driver) 2. Narendra Kumar Towry S/o Kishan Towry R/o Sukma District Sukma Chhattisgarh. (Owner) 3. Branch Manager, The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh. (Non Claimants) ... Respondents For Petitioners : None appeared even in two round For Respondents : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11/04/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.a The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the Misc Claim Case No. 15/2019, in the Court of Third Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Bastar Place Jagdalpur (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.b The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing or set aside the impugned order dated 29.03.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Third Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Bastar Place Jagdalpur (C.G.) in Misc. Claim Case 15/2019. 10.c The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other writ, order, direction, which this Hon’ble Court finds appropriate and suitable in favour of the petitioner. 10.d Cost of the petition be awarded. ” 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners even in two round. It appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti