Page | 1 $~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5247/2017 PARUL TANEJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Gaur & Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocates Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent- State Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 23.01.2025 1. The present Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking quashing of the Complaint, CC No.16479/2016, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, West District, Delhi, filed by Respondents No.2 and 3 under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. 2. Respondent No.2 submits that the Complaint in question is at the stage of final hearing. 3. Learned Counsel for Petitioner submits that this case is pending for last nine years, which emanates from a matrimonial dispute and Trial Court be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 12:37:51 Page | 2 after pronouncement of the final judgment. 5. This Petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner as aforesaid. The learned Trial Court is directed to not give unnecessary adjournment in the matter and make an earnest effort to expeditiously decide it. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 23, 2025 r This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 12:37:51