SURENDRA NATH MAHATO And ORS. v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS.
WPC/4568/2005 · 2025-07-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3548 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3548 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:20196 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C). No.4568 of 2005
------
1. Surendra Nath Mahato,
2. Firendra Nath Mahto,
3. Brindaban Mahato,
4. Gopal Mahato, All sons of Bishwanath Mahto @ Ghasinath Mahato, resident of village Gomda, P.O.-Rahe, P.S.-Sonahatu, Distrit-Ranchi.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Member Board of Revenue, Jharkhand, P.O. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.
3. The Additional Collector, Land Ceiling, Ranchi, P.O.-Ranchi, District-Ranchi.
4. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Khunti, P.O.-Khunti, District-Ranchi. 5(a).Vishnu Charan Mahto 5(b). Subhash Chandra Mahato S/o Late Rajni Mahatain 5(c). Saibhya Kumari, D/o Late Rajni Mahatain
All resident of Village-Gomda, P.O.-Rahe, P.S.-Sonahatu, Dist- Ranchi. .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : None
For the State
: Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, AC to SC(L&C)-I
------
Order No.24 Dated- 23/07/2025
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this case.
Accordingly, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/