IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 1077 of 2025 Date of Decision : 2.12.2025 State of HP ....Petitioner Versus Ramesh Chand and another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For the respondents : None. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) The present petition has been filed on the ground that the matter was compromised before the Lok Adalat and one of the injured Sumeena Kumari was not present before the Lok Adalat, hence the Lok Adalat had no jurisdiction to compound the offence. 2. Today, status report stands filed in which it has been reported that the injured Sumeena Kumari has compromised the matter and she does not want to proceed further. Therefore, the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 very premise of the petition that Sumeena Kumari was not ready to compound the offence does not survive. 3. Since, there is no reason to exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court, hence, the present petition is dismissed. 4. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 2nd December, 2025 (Chander)