HARI SINGH RAWAT S/O LAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16319/2024 · 2025-01-10
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35474 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35474 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1607] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16319/2024 Hari Singh Rawat S/o Lal Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Shekhawat & Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0433/2024 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 72(1), 75(2), 110, 332(c) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The FIR has been lodged on account of private dispute. He further submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured has been opined as dangerous to life rather said injury was found simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:1607] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16319/2024]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that injury sustained to the injured has been opined as simple in nature, custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Hari Singh Rawat S/o Lal Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Sunita/253