M/s.AGA Publications Limited., v. Mr.C.Vijaya Bhaskar,
AS/263/2017 · 2025-02-19
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010018572017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No: 263/2017 Between: M/s.aga Publications Limited., ...APPELLANT AND Mr C Vijaya Bhaskar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
This appeal suit is filed by the appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 09.12.2016 passed in O.S.No.101 of 2013, on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Anantapuramu.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant is present. None appeared for the respondent.
3.
Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo dated 18.02.2025, wherein it is stated that, during the pendency of the appeal, the respondent
TMR, J A.S.No.263 of 2017 2
herein filed E.P.No.232 of 2020, on the file of the XVII Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, for execution of the Decree passed in O.S.No.101 of 2013.
4. It further stated that during the pendency of Execution Petition, the appellant and respondent herein compromised the matter and as a result of compromise, full satisfaction memo had been filed in E.P.No.232 of 2020, after receiving an amount of Rs.30,00,000/- by the respondent.
5. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the appellant filed daily status report of E.P.No.232 of 2020, obtained from the website, wherein it states as follows:
“Both parties present along with their counsel and in open court. JDR handed over D.D.& #039; for Rs.27,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- to DHR and both parties reported that matter is settled out of Court. The DHR filed full satisfaction memo and requested to dismiss the E.P. as not pressed. Full satisfaction memo is recorded and accordingly E.P. is dismissed as not pressed.”
6. Considering the material placed as a Prima Facie and since the matter is compromised between the parties, the cause of action in this Appeal does not survive.
7. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as cause of action does not survive. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
TMR, J A.S.No.263 of 2017 3
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 19.02.2025 M K K