Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35463 (AP)

Smt. Vanjarapu Nagamani v. Gullipalli Kameswara Rao

AS/559/2010 · 2025-06-16

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ir IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT^' TUESDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 559 OF 2010 Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and decree in OS.No. 249 of 2006 dt. 15.09.2008 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District. Between: 1. Smt. Vanjarapu Nagamani, W/o. Shri Chinna Rao, Aged about 46 yrs, Housewife, Agricultural Coolie, R/o. Satarampadu, Opp: Nagadevatha Temple, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2. Vanjarapu Chinna Rao, S/o. Shri Narasimhulu. Aged about: 50 yrs. Agricultural Coolie, R/o. Satarampadu, Opp; Nagadevatha Temple, ELuru, West Godavari District. ...Appellants/Defendants AND Gullipalli Kameswara Rao, S/o. Appala Naidu, aged about; 47 yrs, Occ: Cultivation and Business, R/o. Satrampadu, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...Respondent/Plaintiff Counsel for the Appellants: Sri K J V N Pundareekakshudu Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Yallabandi Ramatirtha The Court made the following: APHC010563662010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL AUIT NO: 559/2010 Between: Smt. Vanjarapu Nagamani and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Gullipalli Kameswara Rao ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU Counsel for the Respondent: 1.N SIVA REDDY 2.YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.559 OF 2010 r ' JUDGMENT: None appeared for the appellants, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, representation for the appellants on the previous adjournments also. There was no 2. Learned counsel representing Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1 is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District & Sessions Judge; Eluru, West Godavari records) 2. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari records) 3. One CC to Sri. K J V N Pundareekakshudu District (with District, (with Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Yallabandi Ramatirtha, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravati. Pradesh at 6. Three CD Copies SAM HIGH COURT SAM DATED; 17/06/2025 JUDGMENT AS.No.559 of 2010 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION