Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18100 of 2025 Decided on: 15.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raj Kumari
…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.S.D.Gill, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge CMP No. 30692/2025 In view of averments made in the application, prayer is accepted. The document in form of photocopy of a cheque dated 06.11.2025 appended therewith as Annexure P-2 is taken on record. Application stands disposed of.
CWP No.18100/2025 The grievance of the petitioner was noticed as under in the order passed in this writ petition on 24.11.2025:-
“Petitioner seeks regularization with the assertion that she is continuing with respondents as on date, however, but for the certificate issued 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 in the year 2018, there is no document on record suggesting that petitioner is continuing as on date. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed two weeks time to place on record document evidencing petitioner’s continuation as on date. List on 15.12.2025.”
2. Pursuant to the above order, the petitioner has placed on record alongwith an application, photocopy of a cheque dated 06.11.2025 statedly issued to her by the Principal, GSSS, Matiana, GUSSS Matiana, Tehsil Tehog as salary for the month of November, 2025. As noticed in the previous order passed in this petition, the petitioner seeks regularization w.e.f. year, 2018. Save and except the aforesaid cheque, statedly in form of salary to the petitioner for the month of November, 2025 and certificate issued to the petitioner in the year, 2018, there is still no other document on record. The relief prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted to her on the basis of documents placed on record. Confronted with above, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law alongwith supporting documents in furtherance of relief claimed by the petitioner.
3
3. Granting such permission, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 15, 2025 Judge yogesh