Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35459 (KAR)

S.B. BOREGOWDA, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/1238/2024 · 2025-02-18

M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7177-DB CCC No. 1238 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1238 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. S.B. BOREGOWDA, AGE:77 YEARS, 2. S.B. KEMPEGOWDA AGE: 73 YEARS, BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE K. BOREGOWDA K. SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE CHIKKARASINAKERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 422. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. ... PROFORMA RESPONDENT Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7177-DB CCC No. 1238 of 2024 2. DR. KUMAR IAS MAJOR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA - 571 401. 3. SMT. PAMPASHREE U.P. KMAS AGE: MAJOR COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MANDYA - 571 401. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT; SRI H.C. SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE FOR R.3; R.2: SERVED.) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 06.11.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.16683/2021 (LB-RES) MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7177-DB CCC No. 1238 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. Mahesh R. Uppin for the complainants states that he has filed the memo dated 06.02.2025 for withdrawal of the petition, which figures on record. 2. In view of the memo, permission is granted to withdraw the petition. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84