Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35458 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPTT

Cont.(Cvl)/860/2023 · 2025-10-17

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32312 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 860 of 2023 Sanjay Kumar Sinha aged about 56 years, S/o late Madan Mohan Prasad Sinha Resident of House of Shri Brij Bihari Saran, Makan No.316A, Hanuman Nagar, Barkagaon Road, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Nancy Sahay, the Deputy Commissioner – cum – the chairman of District Education Establishment Committee, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh 3. Santosh Gupta, the District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhakar Pandey, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, GA I : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GA I --- 05/17.10.2025 The learned counsels for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite party no.2, for his alleged willful disobedience to the order dated 11.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 1531 of 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that the reasoned order has been passed in terms of the order dated 11.07.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1531 of 2023. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the reasoned order is not as per law. He submits that liberty may be reserved with the petitioner to take steps in connection with the reasoned order. 2025:JHHC:32312 2 5. Considering the submissions and the nature of the order passed by this Court, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding, which is hereby dropped. 6. However, liberty is reserved with the petitioner to take steps in connection with the reasoned order as may be permissible under law. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 17.10.2025 Saurav Uploaded on 18.10.2025