IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 613 Zorawar Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. BS Patwalia, Advocate for the petitio Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition 23.07.2003 whereby one post of Deputy Director, Sports, has been allocated to the reserve category of Schedul surviving. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 6 of the written statement to state that the DPC met again while he and petitioner No.2 retired w.e.f. 31.05.2004 and 31.01.2004, respectively, to which there is no replication filed 3. Learned counsel also contact with the petitioners. 4. Disposed of, reserving in case need arises 02.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14557 Date of Zorawar Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Gaurav Jagota, Advocate for Mr. BS Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition 23.07.2003 whereby one post of Deputy Director, Sports, has been allocated to the reserve category of Scheduled Caste, might not due to efflux of time, even be Learned State counsel refers to para 6 of the written statement to state that the DPC met again on 25.05.2004 and petitioner No.1 was promoted while he and petitioner No.2 retired w.e.f. 31.05.2004 and 31.01.2004, , to which there is no replication filed Learned counsel also submits that he has been unable to establish the petitioners. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner in case need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14557-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY for Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 23.07.2003 whereby one post of Deputy Director, Sports, has been allocated to ight not due to efflux of time, even be Learned State counsel refers to para 6 of the written statement to 25.05.2004 and petitioner No.1 was promoted while he and petitioner No.2 retired w.e.f. 31.05.2004 and 31.01.2004, , to which there is no replication filed. submits that he has been unable to establish the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for quashing the order dated 23.07.2003 whereby one post of Deputy Director, Sports, has been allocated to ight not due to efflux of time, even be Learned State counsel refers to para 6 of the written statement to 25.05.2004 and petitioner No.1 was promoted, while he and petitioner No.2 retired w.e.f. 31.05.2004 and 31.01.2004, submits that he has been unable to establish with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.03 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document