Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35453 (JHR)

KUNDAN KUMAR DAS ALIAS KUNDAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3615/2025 · 2025-05-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13514] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3615 of 2025 ------ Kundan Kumar Das @ Kundan Kumar, Aged about 22 years, Son of Sahdeo Das, resident of Village Sankari, P.O. & P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-05-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.130 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Khusbu Kumari to the tune of Rs.7,996/- and Dhiraj Kumar Dewangan to the tune of Rs.1,898/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that one mobile phone and SIM card were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.12.2024 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.7,996/- and Rs.1,898/- to the bank account of Khusbu Kumari and Dhiraj Kumar Dewangan respectively, without prejudice to his defence. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.7,996/- and Rs.1,898/- to the bank account of Khusbu Kumari and Dhiraj Kumar Dewangan respectively without prejudice to his defence and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.130 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/