1 2025:CGHC:5224 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2065 of 2023 Amay Yadav S/o H.K. Yadav, aged about 30 years R/o Plot No. 4, Road No. 9, Sector 12, New Panvel, District Raigarh, Maharastra ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through SHO, Police Station, Kotwali, Bastar, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajiv Bajpai S/o Ravi Shankar Bajpai, aged about 57 years R/o Main Road, Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate _________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 29 . 01 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/ respondent No.1 and Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.2. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.01.29 17:59:50 +0530 2 2. The present petition under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed by the petitioner in person with the following prayer :- “1. It is, respectfully prayed that the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner may kindly be called from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jagaldalpur District Bastar (C.G). 2. It is, respectfully prayed that the entire proceedings of Crime No. 402/2016 registered at police station Kotwali, Distrci Bastar (C.G), filing of charge sheet for offences punishable under Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w section 34 of IPC and subsequent criminal proceedings initiated there from bearing Criminal Case No. 1556/2017 pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jagaldalpur District Bastar (C.G) may kindly be quashed in larger interest of Justice. 3. Any other further order(s) as deemed fit and necessary by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn as the charges have already been framed against the petitioner, the trial is in progress and evidence of 2 prosecution witnesses have already been recorded. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty co-operate in the trial. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra