APHC010564422022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ry. WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 34668 OF 2022 Between: D. Nagaraju, S/o. D.Kristappa, aged about 40 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o. D.No. 2/152 Venkatareddypalli village, Penukonda Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, now Sri Satyasai District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Union of India, rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi. 2. South Western Railways, Bangalore, Karnataka State, rep. by its Chief General Manager. 3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, South Western Railways, Bangalore-23 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the orders passed in O.A.No. 2o| 1123^2015 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, as quash the same. r lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to issue the appointment orders to the petitioner herein as Trackman by considering the re-medical test report submitted by Shankar Netralaya dt.22-12-2014, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI P. PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : SRI JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL GOVT.) The Court made the following order: APHCOI 0564422022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] rn WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 34668/2022 Between: 1.D.NAGARAJU, S/0 D.KRISTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- UNEMPLOYEE, R/0 D.NO. 2/152 VENKATAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, NOW SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2.SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER. 3.THE SENIOR DIVISIOINAL PERSONNEL OFFICER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, BANGALORE-23 ...RESPONDENT{S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RSUJAN KUMAR 2 HBKMJ & HAHHSU, W.P.No.34668 of 2022 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)) 2.JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL CENTRAL GOVT.) FOR t 3 HBKM,J & HAHHS,J W.P.No.34668 of 2022 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in OA/20/1123/2015 dated 14.03.2022. The petitioner seeks appointment under Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS). Since it was not considered by the respondent department, he filed O.A. before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench seeking necessary direction to the respondents therein to issue appointment letter to the petitioner herein/applicant therein as trackman on par with the others under the said scheme. 3. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Manjith & Others vs Union of India and another \n W.P.(Civii)No.78 of 2021 dated 29.01.2021 as it supported the decision of the Railway Board in terminating the said scheme, held that the said decision continues to stand. Accordingly, the said O.A. was dismissed. Assailing the same this writ petition was filed. 4. The respondents also filed detailed counter affidavit stating that the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that all the claims based on the scheme must now be closed as per the Para No.6 of the said judgment. 4 HBKM,J & HAHHS;J W.P.No.34668of2022 as there is no scheme in operation in the Railways cannot be considered in any manner on 5. In view of the same department, the claim of the petitioner any ground. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be Interim order, if any, no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- N. NAGAMMA assistant registrar ^^^ICER To, SECTIO 1. One CC to Sri R. Sujan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] s' Tnl rr? "r """ fOPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:02/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 34668 OF 2022 .•V ■ S( 0 3 SEP 2025 ntSecto mi Co' 211^^ DISMISSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS