JULE KHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/2696/2025 · 2025-03-19
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-2696-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 19.03.2025 JULE KHA AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner by providing adequate protection to the petitioners.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Superintendent of Police, Nuh, Mewat to decide the representations dated 15.02.2025, 09.03.2025 and 11.03.2025 (Annexure P-3 and P-4) within a time bound manner.
3.
Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- the Superintendent of Police, Nuh, Mewat is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 15.02.2025, 09.03.2025 and 11.03.2025 (Annexure P-3 and P-4) by passing a speaking order in Anuradha 2025.03.20 22:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-2696-2025 -2- accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 19.03.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anuradha 2025.03.20 22:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document