Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010563232023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 29186/2023 Between:
1. KANAKADURGA AGRO OIL PRODUCT, (VJA115) GANGURU, VIJAYWADA REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DV BHAVANI PRASAD S/O. VEERARAGHAVIAH
2. M/S.SATYAKALA AGRO OIL PRODUCTS LTD ,, (VJA 545) GANGURU,VIJAYWADA REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D SAI PRASAD SIO. RAMA RAO
3. M/S. DHANEKULA COLD STORAGE PVT LTD,, (GOVT 594) ANKIREDDY PALEM, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS M.D.
D.RAVINDRANATH TAGORE, S/O.VENKATSUBBAIAH
4. M/S. DHANEKULA VENKATSUBBIAH CHARITABLE TRUST, , (VJA 668) KANURU, VIJAYWADA REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE D.RAVINDRANATH TAGORE S/O. VENKATSUBBAIAH
5. M/S. DHANEKULA VENKATSUBBIAH CHARITABLE TRUST ,, (VJA 3091) GANGURU,VIJAYWADA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL KADIYALA RAVI S/O. KOTESHWAR RAO
6. M/S. RAVINDRA SOLVENT OILS PRIVATE LIMITED ,(, VJA007) KANURU, VIJAYAWADA REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR D.NAGENDRA BABU ,S/O. VENKATSUBBIAH
7. M/S. SRI KANAKADURGA ENTERPRISES ,, (SC 6521302000921), VENKATESHWARAPURAM , VIJAYAWADA REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY DV BHAVANI PRASAD S/O. VEERARAGHAVIAH
8. M/S. VIGNESH ENTERPRISES ,, (VJA 571) ,QUALITY HOTEL DV MANOUR,VIJAYAWADA REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER D NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O. RAMARAO
9. M/S.SRI DHANEKULA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH,, (VJA872)SHYAMNAGAR , VIJAYWADA, REP. BY ITS PARTNER DHANEKULA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH S/O. VENKATA SUBBIAH RAO
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PD. SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI 522 237, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED APCPDCL, , BESIDE POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, ITI ROAD, VIJAYAWADA 520 008, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, APCPDCL, RAJBHAVAN ROAD, VIJAYAWADA 520 002
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in issuing G.O. Ms.No. 7 Energy (Power II) Department dated 08-04-2022 where under the levy of electricity duty was increased from Rs. 0.06 Paise per unit to Rs.
0.06 Paise per unit to Rs. 1.00 PS on the energy sales made to the commercial and industrial consumers as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents and their subordinates to adjust the refundable amount in the future consumption bills of the petitioners and to levy electricity duty @ Rs.0.06 Paise only from the petitioners service connections and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents and their subordinates not to disconnect the power supply to the service connections of the petitioners for recovery of electricity duty @ Rs. 1/- per unit in pursuance of G.O. Ms.No. 7 Energy (Power — II) Department dated 08-04¬2022, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K V UPENDRA GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENERGY
2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following:
ORDER
Challenging the G.O.Ms.No.7 Energy (Power-III) Department dated 08.04.2022, the above writ petition has been filed. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the common order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch dated 26.06.2025. 3. The Division Bench of this Court inW.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch dated 26.06.2025, observed as follows:
“92. As can be seen from the above extract, this G.O. has been issued for permitting licensees to collect, from consumers, the Duty fixed under G.O.Ms.No.7. Since G.O.Ms.No.7, has been struck down, the question of granting sanction to collect Duty, fixed under G.O.Ms.No.7, would not arise. Accordingly, G.O.Ms.No.22 is also struck down. As this G.O. has been struck down, on this ground, this court is not going into the other contentions raised against this G.O.
93. …
94. For the aforesaid reasons, all the cases are disposed of in terms of the following order:
1. The amendment to Section 3, by Act 23 of 2024, to the extent of granting power to the government to fix the rate of Duty between six paise to one rupee per unit is upheld. 2. The amendment to Section 3, by Act 10 of 2021 and Act 23 of 2024, to the extent of granting power to the government to identify categories of consumers, for purposes of fixing the rate of tariff is set aside. 3. The proviso, to Section 3, stipulating that, in the absence of the rate of duty notified by the state government for different consumer categories
at any given time, a minimum duty of 6 paise (Rs. 0.06) per unit of energy shall be levied, shall remain unaffected. 4. The amendments to Section 7, by Act 23 of 2024, are struck down. 5. G.O.Ms.No.7, dated 08.04.2022 is struck down. However, the government is entitled to collect Duty at the rate of 6 paise per unit, throughout the period from the date when Act 10 of 2021 was published in the Gazette till such time as the rate of duty is modified, in accordance with law. Further, the exemption granted to agricultural consumers under G.O.Ms.No.82, dated 07.07.2003, remains in force. 6. G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 23.10.2024, is struck down.
However, G.O.Ms.No.277, dated 09.12.1994, remains in force throughout the disputed period and the Licensees are permitted to recover Duty, at the rate of 6 paise per unit, from the consumers, subject to any exemption that may have been granted, or would be granted, under section 3A of the Duty Act.”
4. Given the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the common
order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch dated 26.06.2025. No order as to costs.
The Registry is directed to annexe the copy of the common order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch dated 26.06.2025 to this order. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date :02.07.2025 TVN
309 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.29186 OF 2023
Date :02.07.2025 TVN