Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35424 (RAJ)

BHAJAN LAL GURJAR @ RAM BHAJAN GURJAR S/O RAJA RAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/434/2024 · 2025-01-13

Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1755-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 434/2024 Bhajan Lal Gurjar @ Ram Bhajan Gurjar S/o Raja Ram Gurjar, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Village Didwari @ Didwadi, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sawaimadhopur, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Boli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). 5. Sukh Ram S/o Rameshwar Prasad, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Trilokpura, Tehsil Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Khandelwal with Ms. Gauri Meena For State : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Radha Raman Gupta, SHO Boli District Sawai Madhopur, Present in Person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 13/01/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this habeas corpus petition seeking production of the corpus who happens to be daughter of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:1755-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-434/2024] 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that corpus is a minor as per the S.R. Register. 3. Factual report was called for. As per the factual report, corpus has entered into a registered marriage. She has also obtained a protection order from the Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2156/2024. 4. Mr. Radha Raman Gupta, SHO Boli District Sawai Madhopur is present in the Court who has stated before the Court that the school entry form is not available in the School. The S.R. Register also has over writing and the date of birth mentioned in numbers is not matching with the date of birth in words. 5. Considering the fact that the corpus has entered into a registered marriage and she has obtained a protection order from the Court; her school entry form is not available and there is over writing in the S.R. Register, we are not inclined to entertain the present habeas corpus petition. 6. The present habeas corpus petition is accordingly, dismissed. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J MAHIMA/27