Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35421 (AP)

RESAPU HEMANTHA REDDY v. SRI RESAPU SEETHARAMA REDDY & 9 OTHERS

AS/59/2016 · 2025-03-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE i PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 59 OF 2016 Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated July, 2015 passed in O.S.No. 247 of 2012 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District in so far as rejecting the claim in respect of Item No.1 and 3 of the suit schedule properties as well as granting share to the defendants No.8 and 9 in Item No.2 and decree the Suit O.S.No. 247 of 2012. Between: Resapu Hemantha Reddy, S/o Seetharama Reddy, Aged about 54 years. Employee, R/o H.No.52-11-8, Revapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Mandal and District. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND Sri Resapu Seetharama Reddy, S/o Late Ramaswamy Reddy, Aged about 83 years. Retired Employee, R/o. Revapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Mandal and District. Smt.Resapu Savithri, S/o Late Srirama Reddy, Aged about 55 years. Housewife, R/o H.No.9-1-44/7, New Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Mandal and District-530013. Sri Resapu Udaya Sankara Reddy, S/o. Late Srirama Reddy, Aged about 27 years, R/o H.No.9-1-44/7, New Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Mandal and District-530013. Sri Resapu Udaya Jagadish Manohar Reddy, S/o. Late Srirama Reddy, R/o H.No.9-1-44/7, New Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City Mandal and District-530013. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sri Resapu Nagi Reddy (PET), S/o Seetharama Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Korukonda Sainik School, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 6. Sri Resapu Venkata Siva Hemasndara Reddy, S/o Late Seetharama Reddy, Aged about 46 years, R/o D.No.52-11-8, Resapuvanipalem Visakhapatnam City, Mandal and District-530013. 7. Sri Resapu Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Late Seetharama Reddy, Aged about 43 years, R/o D.No.52-11-8, Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam City, Man Jai and District-530013. 8. Smt.YadIa Rajyalakshmi, W/o Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 57 years R/o p.No.50-93-9/B, Santhipuram, Seethammapeta, Visakhapatnam Ci’tv Mandal and District-530016. 9. Smt.Koyya Durga Devi, W/o Venkata Ramana Reddy, Aged about 49 years, R/o D.No.36-7-5, Reddy KanchLrapaiern, Visakhapatnam City Mandal and District-530008. M/s. Ratnam Builders, Rep.by its Proprietor, Sri Doddi Venkata Ramana S/o Late Venkataswamy, R/o D.No.49-2-58/A, Ramakrishna Nagar, Visakhapatnam-530016 10. ...Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A K KISHORE REDDY The Court made the following order: (RNT,J & MRKJ A.S. NO.59OF2016) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT No: 59 OF 2016 JUDGMENT:- {per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, being aggrieved by the preliminary decree dated 08.07.2015 passed in O.S.No.247 of 2012 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatngm, which was filed for partition of suit schedule property. 2. This Court has not granted any interim order in this appeal. 3. As the matter pertains to the year 2016, it is listed in the Weekly Cause-list”. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation 4. on either side. Even, at the revised call also, none appeared. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for 5. default. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / fV.eT&r, //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To. 1. The VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri A K Kishore Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 AND/y^ /S o S 2 7 MAR 2025 S ^ . Current Section ^ ^'■- — ORDER UOUO0S tuejjno ^^ mmLi B AS.No.59 of 2016 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS