Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3542 (UTT)

AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/51/2025 · 2025-03-19

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1920-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 51 OF 2025 19TH MARCH, 2025 Dr. Ajay Kumar …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State / respondents The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2) In the Government Order, it is noted that the petitioner has served in all for 10 years and 01 month in accessible areas out of his total service of about 19 years, 2025:UHC:1920-DB 2 and, at present, he has been serving for more than 06 years in the present accessible area. 3) In that view of the matter, there being no other ground which would disentitle the petitioner from being transferred, we find no warrant to interfere with the order under challenge. 4) The writ petition being misconceived is, accordingly, rejected. 5) As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 19TH MARCH, 2025 Negi