1 APHC010564412009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19301/2009 Between: Md. Saifuddin, Visakhapatnam Dist. ...PETITIONER AND The M D Apsrtc Hyd 2 Oths and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S V RAMANA The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of ADC / Controller as per the seniority and denying promotion contrary to the seniority list of conductors and drivers of 2 Visakhapatnam Region as illegal unjust and arbitrary contrary to Regulations and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of the justice and pass...” 2. Ms.Parveen, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri T.Vinod Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC appearing on behalf of the respondents is present. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 24.01.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.19301 of 2009 24.01.2025 ASR