Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35408 (AP)

Md. Avez Baig v. Sri. Ajay Jain I.A.S

CC/5994/2023 · 2025-07-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010562222023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5994/2023 Between: 1. MD. AVEZ BAIG, S/O. ASRAF BAIG AGED 25 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR R/O. 16-08-288, VAISHNAVI PALACE, MUTHYALAPALEM ROAD, RAMALINGAPURAM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI AJAY JAIN I.A.S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVA.THI. 2. SRI SAMSHER SINGH RAWATH I.A.S., PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.P. SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 3. SRI D P G LAKSHMI, MANAGING DIRECTOR, STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED., D.NO, 12-52, ENIKEPADU, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 521108 4. SRI A NAGARAJU, PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. SRI M V MOHAN RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (HOUSING) GUDUR DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for their wilful disobedience to the order dated 20.04.2023 passed in W.P.No. 7138 of 2023 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA JAGANNADHA RAO E 2. The Court made the following order: On earlier occasion, when the learned counsel for the respondents reported compliance of the orders, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondents that the orders of this Court have been complied with, there remains nothing for adjudication and contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance, he is at liberty to file appropriate application in accordance with law. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS