[2025:RJ-JP:7019] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19702/2024 Laxminarayan Mittal Son Of Shri Durga Prasad Mittal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 95, Girnar Colony, Gandhi Path, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Additional Chief Secretary, Finance, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Room No. 206, Main Building, 2Nd Floor, Ram Kishor Vyas Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/02/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made in this petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two different representations were submitted by the petitioner in the month of November and December, 2024 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the same has not been decided for the reasons best known to the respondents. Learned counsel further [2025:RJ-JP:7019] (2 of 2) [CW-19702/2024] submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024) has issued a general mandamus for all the Departments of the State to decide the representation of the aggrieved persons within a stipulated time but till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided, hence a direction be issued to the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner within a time frame. 3. The present writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/21