KOKKIRA VEERA RAGHAVAMMA, MEDAK DIST. v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.,T.W.,HYD.,& 4 OTRS.
WP/1952/2014 · 2025-07-17
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35405 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35405 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010562442014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1952/2014 Between:
1. KOKKIRA VEERA RAGHAVAMMA, MEDAK DIST., OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. BHEL COLONY, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, MEDAK DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVT OF A P T W HYD 4 OTRS, DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. AGENT TO THE GOVERNMENT/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR TRIBAL WELFARE, RAMPACHODAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 5. BONKU PRABHAKAR RAO S/O SWAMY, R/O. NELLIPUDI VILLAGE, GANGAVARUM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D LALITHA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Ms. M. Jessy Sowmya, learned Counsel appearing online on behalf of Sri Smt. D. Lalitha Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Ms. CH. Swapna Priya, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare. 2. The Interim Order of this Court dated 16.06.2014 would indicate that this Court had given Interim Directions to the Respondent Authorities to act on the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 13.07.2013 (Ex.P.1). 3. Ms. CH. Swapna Priya, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Special Deputy Collector, dated 16.07.2025, along with the relevant documents. Copies of it are not supplied to the learned Counsel appearing for learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, as she is appearing online. The Written Instructions are taken on record. 4. The said related document is the final Order passed by the Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodvaram, East Godavari District, in L.T.R.P. No.46/2014 dated 02.03.2017. 5. This Court perused the contents of the final Order passed by the Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodvaram, East Godavari District, in L.T.R.P. No.46/2014 dated 02.03.2017. 6. The Operative portion of the said Order indicates that the Special Deputy Collector has rendered a finding that the dispute between the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent No.5 is essentially a civil dispute. It is
3
noticed that the Special Deputy Collector has passed a detailed speaking Order with proper reasons. 7.
Therefore, this Court is of the view that the purpose for filing the present Writ Petition has already been served by the passing of the Order by the Special Deputy Collector dated 02.03.2017 in L.T.R.P. No.46/2014. 8. In terms of the Order dated 02.03.2017, the Writ Petitioner is at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law. It is clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 9. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 10. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Date: 18.07.2025 DSV