SHAILESH RAMDAS SONAWANE AND ANOTHER v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS
ABA/1834/2025 · 2026-08-18
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 956 aba 1834.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1834 OF 2025
1. Shailesh S/o Ramdas Gaikwad, Age : 25 Years, Occu. : Labour,
2. Somnath s/o Kailas Dale, Age : 21 Years, Occu. : Labour, Both R/o Chapadgaon, Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Vijay S. Wakale, Advocate for the Applicants. Mrs. P. J. Bharad, A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri P. A. Dhakne, Advocate h/f Shri S. E. Shekade, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 18TH AUGUST, 2026.
ORDER : . This Court is informed that during the pendency of the present application investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been filed.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court applicants have attended concern police station and, therefore, seeks confirmation of interim relief. 2026:BHC-AUG:37005
2 956 aba 1834.25
4. Learned A. P. P. opposes the application.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 – victim vehemently opposes the application.
6. There is nothing on record to indicate that the applicants have not cooperated in the investigation. Even they have not misused the liberty granted by this Court. In the facts of the case, this Court finds no reason not to confirm the interim relief. Hence application is allowed by confirming the interim order dated 16.10.2025. The anticipatory bail application stands
disposed of.
[ R. M. JOSHI, J. ]
bsb/Aug. 26