Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35399 (CHH)

TEJMANI MANJHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8395/2025 · 2025-08-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8395 of 2025 1 - Tejmani Manjhi W/o Mohan Manjhi Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Bhora Para, Rajnagar Bakawand Bastar C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Of Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhavan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Kondagaon Collectorate Dist- Kondagaon C.G. 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Farasgaiob Dist- Kondagaon C.G. 4 - Directorate Of Public Education Chhattisgarh 1st Floor Indravati Bhawan New Raipur Raipur C.G. 5 - District Education Officer Dist- Kondagaon C.G. 6 - Kanya Ashram Bailgaon Dist- Kondagaon C.G. 7 - Primary School Khutdobra Block Kondagaon Dist- Kondagaon C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Aslam Khan, Advocate. For State : Shri K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 19.08. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 03.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred under the Teachers Rationalization Instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh 2 representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder