- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 163 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. ANAND, S/O VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 2. SUSHEELA, W/O GOPI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 3. SUPRIYA, W/O SATISH KUMAR,, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 4. VIVEK KUMAR, S/O RAVI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 5. SHYAM KUMAR S/O YESUDASS AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 6. RAVI, S/O GURUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 7. PRASHANTHI, D/O PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 8. SURESH, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 9. AMOSE, S/O ASEERVATHAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.98, ANDHRA BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. 10. DHANAMMA W/O LATE NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.98, ANDHRA BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 11. SUGANTHI, D/O ANAND, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.88, KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 12. SUNIL S/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 13. PARIMALA W/O MILLER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT TELUGU BANK LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 120. 14. FEBILA, W/O LATE JACOB, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.147, NEW MODEL HOUSE, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. 15. RAMA KRISHNAIAH S/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.156, NEW CRICKET BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. 16. THENMOLI W/O KUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.100, WATCHMAN BAND LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 17. PRATHAP, S/O LATE JACOB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT ANDHRA BLOCK MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF KOLAR - 563 119. 18. JEEVAN BABU S/O ROSAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.1, ANDHRA BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. 19. VIGNESH S/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT CRICKET BLOCK, NEW MODEL HOUSE MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. 20. SHEELA D/O NITHYANANDAM AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT ANDHRA BLOCK MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF KOLAR - 563 119. 21. SUPRIYA, D/O LATE PREM KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT ANDHRA BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S. JEEVAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE SAFAI KARMACHARI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SAIRA BAG, NO.19/4, 3RD FLOOR, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. 3. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, KARNATAKA STATE SAFAI KARMACHARI, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1; SMT. MANJULA D, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING BENGALURU DATED 24/03/2023 PASSED BY THE R1 (ANNEXURE-J) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:4038 WP No. 163 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the respondents No.2 and 3 have assured that they would sanction Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) towards the rehabilitation of the petitioners and in view of the assurance given by the respondents, the petitioners do not press the writ petition. 2. The memo is placed on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 CT: BHK